Chaplin
I didn’t know a whole lot about Charlie Chaplin’s life before seeing the new musical Chaplin. Most of what I knew came from the Robert Downey, Jr., Chaplin biopic from the 90s, and from various history-of-comedy documentaries I’ve watched. Chaplin tries to enlighten us as to the life and times of the Little Tramp’s creator, but that actually turns out to be the show’s downfall.
My parents accompanied me to Chaplin (book by Christopher Curtis and Thomas Meehan, original score by Curtis), and during intermission, my dad remarked that he thought the show was uneven. He’s right. More specifically, there is no natural flow. For example, a big song and dance number ends act one, but that type of number doesn’t fit with what comes before. Moreover, there is very little in the way of transitions. It’s almost as if Curtis and Meehan said, “Okay. We have to tell this part of his life. Let’s write a scene. Next. Next,” rather than telling a story. The second act has a bit more of a natural flow, and the stakes are finally revealed so we have a reason to invest in the characters. Still, it feels rushed, as they try to fit in all the “crucial” moments in Chaplin’s life.


The other standouts are the scenic (Beowulf Boritt), costume (Amy Clark and the late Martin Pakledinaz), make up (Angelina Avallone) and lighting (Ken Billington) designs, which combine to keep everything and everyone - except for the Little Tramp’s signature red rose boutonniere - in black and white, just like Chaplin’s films.
The Little Tramp was very funny and pioneered comedy on film, but Chaplin’s personal life was rather bleak. He was separated from his mother Hannah (the lovely Christiane Noll) at an early age, went through several divorces (at the time, his third divorce set the record for the biggest divorce settlement ever) and was exiled from his adopted country, America, for his reported, though not actual, political beliefs. It could be fascinating and compelling, but for all the palpable effort, it falls short.
Comments
Post a Comment