Les Miserables
Translating a stage production—especially an epic musical—to the silver screen can be difficult. I’ve never seen a stage production of Les Miserables (except for the concert that was broadcast on PBS many years ago) but it seems to me that Tom Hooper’s film translation of the Alain Boublil and Claude-Michel Schonberg musical is a decent one, even if there are some glaring flaws along the way.
Adapted from Victor Hugo’s eponymous novel, Les Miserables is equal parts love story and political statement, though it’s ultimately about redemption. We meet our protagonist, Jean Valjean (Hugh Jackman), in 1815 France (after the French Revolution), just as he is being released on parole after serving 19 years in prison for stealing a loaf of bread. As we follow him through 1832, he is given a second chance by a sympathetic bishop (Colm Wilkinson, who originated the role of Valjean on stage in the London and Broadway productions); promises the dying Fantine (Anne Hathaway) he’ll look after her daughter, Cosette (Isabelle Allen as a child, Amanda Seyfried as a young adult); rescues Cosette from the always scheming innkeepers, the Thenardiers (Sacha Baron Cohen and Helena Bonham Carter); and becomes a guardian angel to the student revolutionary Marius (Eddie Redmayne) who, in addition to being student revolution leader Enjolras’s (Aaron Tveit) second in command, has caught the eye of the Thenardiers’ daughter, Eponine (Samantha Barks) and, more germane to Valjean’s interest in him, fallen in love with Cosette. Oh, all this happens while Valjean’s running from the law, having broken his parole, and is being pursued by Javert (Russell Crowe).
Got all that? The truth is, if you’re curious about the details of the story, you should read Hugo’s novel. (It’s a good read, and this is coming from someone who coasted on Cliff’s Notes in high school.) In the film (and, I presume, in the stage production), you gather enough plot to be emotionally engrossed and allow yourself to be entranced by the music. (Les Mis is essentially an operetta; there’s scant dialogue.) And with the music, we come to one of the gross flaws.


But even Jackman’s terrific performance was sometimes tarnished by Tom Hooper’s terrible direction. You may remember that I was not a fan of Hooper’s Oscar-winning direction of The King’s Speech, and his work on Les Mis did nothing to change my mind.
The direction is lazy: Hooper kept using the same pull-away shot to convey importance and power, but the repetition kept the cinematography from conveying either. When he wasn’t repeating that shot, he was being unimaginative and repeating too-close up shots of the actor’s faces. Now, I didn’t mind seeing Aaron Tveit’s or Eddie Redmayne’s face in a tight shot on a big screen, but from a storytelling perspective, it’s entirely ineffective. It’s as if Hooper thinks the only way to show intensity on screen (and maybe as a way of differentiating it from what’s possible on a stage) is to keep the camera at a weird angle and trained squarely on the actors‘ faces. But it isn’t. By closing in his shots, Hooper misses the opportunity for grandness, to make the film look as big and epic as the story it’s telling.
Still, the best part of Les Miserables as a musical is the music itself. So, let us laud the reportedly 70-piece orchestra bringing the music to life. As more and more musicals are being written for small, five-piece bands, it’s a particular treat to hear lush arrangements and listen for the nuance and aural brilliance that can only come with a full orchestra.




While the flaws in this film version keep me from raving, the pros outweigh the cons and make me glad to have finally seen a fully produced version of this landmark musical. It also makes me curious to see it on stage and, if rumors are to be believed, I won’t have to wait very long. Reports say that lead producer (of the stage and screen iterations) Cameron Mackintosh is looking to revive Les Miserables on Broadway in 2014. It would mark the second Broadway revival of the fourth longest-running musical in history. Stay tuned for details!
(On a side note: as my friend’s sage mother pointed out years ago, Les Miserables takes place in France so why is everyone speaking with an English accent?!?)
Great points for both the pros and cons. Yet despite all of the cons you mentioned it still managed to bring tears to my eyes. And several tears at that. Tissues would have been helpful.
ReplyDeleteI'll be seeing the musical in Philadelphia in 2013 and am super excited about the possibility of seeing it on Broadway in 2014 :)
Aren't we the lucky ones, basking in the shadow of nitwits like you, belittling the out-of-this-world performances of these great actors.
ReplyDelete